In any setting where folks gather around a table to discuss what is art and what art is not I must admit I have my own views of what art is and what art is not. Yes I have bias's just like anyone else. I do try to keep my mind open to a wide variety of options and types of art. I diffidently have likes and dislikes.
I like abstracts, modern, classical, primitive, landscapes, flora, just about anything. From pencil drawing to oil paintings, from photography to metal sculptures.
I do have a hard time liking a painting by an adult that looks as if a three year old child painted it. I would rather have the child's painting than the adults. To me if an adult has not progressed beyond that stage; it just leaves to many unanswered questions floating in my head.
Which brings me to my latest creations ... Kaleidoscopes. It is not as easy as I thought. One must have a good photo to make a good kaleidoscope. Believe me when I say 'out of focus only makes it worse'.
I'm finding various items make for very unusual kaleidoscopes. Single items to a collage of items can add different dimensions. Just pressing a button does not make it a beautiful kaleidoscope. In the last two weeks I've had some really ugly things pass in front of my eyes as I play with the Photoshop Kaleidoscope filter controls on one of my photos.
Are Kaleidoscopes art? To me they are...but one needs to wonder about a group of critics around a square table to what their verdict could be?
No comments:
Post a Comment